Look at Sura 58:12 in the Quran.
O you who have believed, when you [wish to] privately consult the Messenger, present before your consultation a charity. That is better for you and purer. But if you find not [the means] – then indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.Sura 58:12
This revelation required Muslims to pay up before having a private consultation with Muhammad!
Was Muhammad peddling the words of God for cash? What was he doing?
The text does not say what charity they were supposed to give towards. Did Muhammad have an approved list of worthy causes? Or were they supposed to give to the worthy cause of “Muhammad and wives”?
Could this suspiciously self-serving revelation really be from God?
Commentary on this verse from Maududi:
According to Hadrat ‘Abdullah bin ‘Abbas, this Command was sent down because the Muslims had started requesting the Holy Prophet (upon whom be Allah’s peace) for private counsel much too frequently; and this put him to great inconvenience. At last, Allah willed to relieve His Prophet of this burden.. (Ibn Jarir).Tafsir Maududi- Surah 58. Al-Mujadila, Ayah 12
Apparently, Allah wanted to relieve his beloved Muhammad from the burden of frequent intrusions of his time and privacy by the insensitive Muslims. So the purpose of this revelation was not just to dissuade the people from annoying Muhammad but also to give him a compensation for his troubles.
The prophet immediately went into profit mode.
Hadrat ‘Ali says when this was enjoined the Holy Prophet asked him, What should be the quantity of the charity? Should it be one dinar? I said: This is more than the people can afford. The Holy Prophet then asked: Should it be half a dinar? I said: This too is too much. Then he asked what it should be. I said . Gold equal to a barley grain. The Holy Prophet remarked: Your advice is for too little! ” (Ibn Jarir, Tirmidhi, Musnad Abu ya’la).Tafsir Maududi
Muhammad consulted Ali, his cousin on the amount that his clients should pay up. One dinar? Half a dinar? Ka-ching.
Why didn’t Allah “reveal” the amount? Was the revelation open to trifling and greed and abuse? In the end, Muhammad rebuffed Ali’s proposal because the amount Ali suggested was deemed “too little”.
The believers who were waiting in line to consult Muhammad privately became restless and began grumbling. These were poor people. They didn’t have a dinar. They didn’t even have half a dinar to spare!
Want to take a guess what happened next?
The revelation was ABROGATED! Cancelled. Abandoned. Scrapped. In the very next verse!
“People kept questioning Allah’s Messenger until they made things difficult for him. Allah provided a way to stop their behavior by this Ayah. One of them would need to speak to Allah’s prophet about a real matter, but could not do so until he gave in charity. This became hard on people and Allah sent down relief from this requirement afterwards..”Sa’id bin Abi ‘Arubah reported from Qatadah and Muqatil bin Hayyan.
Is it that ye are afraid of spending sums in charity before your private consultation (with him)? If, then, ye do not so, and Allah forgives you, then (at least) establish regular prayer; practise regular charity; and obey Allah and His Messenger. And Allah is well-acquainted with all that ye do.Sura 58:13, abrogates 58:12
Islamic records tell us that 58:12 was abrogated in the record time of ONE HOUR!
Ma’amar reported from Qatadah
When you consult the Messenger in private, spend something in charity before your private consultation, was abrogated after being in effect for only one hour of a day.
Abdur-Razzaq recorded that Mujahid said that Ali said,
“No one except me implemented this Ayah, until it was abrogated,”
and he was reported to have said that it remained in effect for merely an hour.
What a misadventure! Can you believe it?
Allah gives a revelation for Muslims to pay up for consulting Muhammad privately. And then one hour later, Allah revoked, repealed and reversed his own revelation because it could not be implemented! Did Allah make a mistake or was the “revelation” a failed scheme of Muhammad that was pinned on Allah as a divine “premature revelation”?
In the Bible, I do not recall any prophet ever trying to milk their listeners for money! Jesus never asked for any payment from those He taught and healed and ministered to them instead. He fed thousands on more than one occasion.
There was one incident though, in Acts 8 where a man named Simon tried to offer money to Peter to buy the power of God.
This was Peter’s response:
“May your money perish with you, because you thought you could buy the gift of God with money! You have no part or share in this ministry, because your heart is not right before God. Repent of this wickedness and pray to the Lord in the hope that he may forgive you for having such a thought in your heart. For I see that you are full of bitterness and captive to sin.”
What a far cry from Muhammad!
4 thoughts on “Pay Up Your Private Consultation Fees”
This is a shockingly biased and rather insecure commentary on these two verses. I feel sorry for you. With more and more insensible people in both the Muslim and Christian camps, I do not see how there ever can be reconciliation and mutual respect. Muhammad was not pocketing the money himself, and it is blatantly clear from the verses. You have tried to intentionally lure the reader away from this central point. Muhammad Never asked people for compensations.
If you have any explanation as to why a revelation from Allah was abrogated after one hour, you’re most welcome to share your opinion.
Attacking me for stating my opinion, does not help Muhammad’s or Allah’s case.
I would gladly explain. The verse was abrogated because the poor people simply did not have the means to first pay charity (buy a hungry man a meal or buy a sick man medicine and so on) and then consult the prophet. The verse was simply sent to awaken the realization in the people that they should comprehend he is a busy man who cannot find time for every single person and every petty concern. Once the realization awakened among the people, the restriction was lifted. In other places in the Quran, the people have been reprimanded for not being appropriately respectful to the prophet.
Have you stopped to think how astonishingly beautiful it is that Allah insists you help a hungry man first before you approach His prophet! The demeanor of Allah (which is literally Alo or Light in ancient Sanskrit, the root of Arabic language) in these verses is that of a very affectionate father who places a restriction on the erring child to teach a lesson and then lifts it with a smile on his face once the realization dawns.
Thanks for your response.
1. Where does it say the payment was for helping the poor? It just says “freewill offering”. We dont know what it was for.
2. If it is “freewill”, then why all the confusion about how much to charge?
3. If the poor could not afford it, as you claim, then why did Muhammad tell Ali that the amount he proposed was TOO LITTLE?
Surely he must have said that it was TOO MUCH!
I already made all these points and more, very clear in the article and you yet chose to ignore them and re-interpret it in a way that make Allah and Muhammad look good to you.
You even dare to call Allah, an “affectionate father”? There is no such imagery for Allah anywhere in Islam.
Again, you have re-created and re-interpreted Allah to what you would like him to be, rather than what he revealed himself to you muslims.
Sura 10:93 makes it clear that Allah is your slave master and nothing more.